Walton's types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dialogic argumentation has thus far been proposed as a way to analyse, understand, and promote meaningful classroom interactions. However, currently there is lack of systematic proposals for conceptualising dialogue goals part teachers' pedagogical repertoire. Our main goal operationalise an existing framework types, the one by theorist Douglas Walton. To do so, we first identify set epistemic criteria meaningful, from point view, discursive interactions, which use ‘framing indicators’ enrich Walton's typology four dialogues (information-seeking, inquiry, discovery, persuasion). We applied resulting pragmatic teacher-student interactions found in 20 transcripts both science social sciences secondary education lessons. that affordances these types were also present discourse, where implied was not fulfilled. discuss findings terms need be able dialogic potentiality accountability within so argumentative potential can fulfilled, productive discourse settings.
منابع مشابه
LEARNER INITIATIVES ACROSS QUESTION-ANSWER SEQUENCES: A CONVERSATION ANALYTIC ACCOUNT OF LANGUAGE CLASSROOM DISCOURSE
This paper investigates learner-initiated responses to English language teachers’ referential questions and learner initiatives after teachers’ feedback moves in meaning-focused question-answer sequences to analyze how interactional practices of language teachers, their initiation and feedback moves, facilitate learner initiatives. Classroom discourse research has largely neglected learner init...
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues
Formal argumentation based dialogue models have attracted some research interests recently. Within this line of research, we propose a formal model for argumentation-based dialogues between agents, using assumption-based argumentation (ABA). Thus, the dialogues amount to conducting an argumentation process in ABA. The model is given in terms of ABA-specific utterances, debate trees and forests ...
متن کاملAgent dialogues and argumentation
Agents have different interests and desires. Agents also hold different beliefs and assumptions. To accomplish tasks jointly, agents need to better convey information between each other and facilitate fair negotiations. In this thesis, we investigate agent dialogue systems developed with the Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework. In our system, agents represent their beliefs and desire...
متن کاملModelling dialogues using argumentation
A number of authors have suggested the use of argumentation techniques as the basis for negotiation dialogues between agents. In this paper we augment this work by investigating the use of argumentation as the basis for a wider range of types of dialogue. The approach we take is based upon MacKenzie’s dialogue game DC, and we show that a translation of this into our system of argumentation can ...
متن کاملModeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
A number of authors have suggested the use of argumentation techniques as the basis for negotiation dialogues between agents. In this paper we augment this work by investigating the use of argumentation as the basis for a wider range of types of dialogue. The approach we take is based upon MacKenzie’s dialogue game DC, and we show that a translation of this into our system of argumentation can ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2210-6561', '2210-657X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100352